Skip navigation

While the Palin wing of the Republican party is celebrating Barack’s scary-sounding middle name, sometimes-serious conservative house organ National Review is debating what shade of red Obama is:

Second, and relatedly, Obama’s radicalism, beginning with his Alinski/ACORN/community organizer period, is a bottom-up socialism.  This, I’d suggest, is why he fits comfortably with Ayers, who (especially now) is more Maoist than Stalinist.  What Obama is about is infiltrating (and training others to infiltrate) bourgeois institutions in order to change them from within — in essence, using the system to supplant the system.

So McCain wanting the governemnt to buy back all the upside down mortgages–––would that be more Stalinist or more Maoist?

Advertisements

One Comment

  1. Marxist. To be specific Harpo Marx.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: